More than just a cosmetic concern, hair loss is more of a personal experience. It affects one’s confidence, self-image, and emotional well-being. The problem is commonly associated with aging, hair thinning, and shedding that can begin at any age.
The main cause of hair loss is associated with stress, hormonal imbalances, or poor nutrition. An unhealthy lifestyle is also one of the major reasons for hair loss, and such a case has led to the demand for non-surgical solutions globally.
That’s why advanced aesthetic clinics like ISAAC Luxe are inclining more towards the top solutions, like PRP – Platelet-Rich Plasma and GFC – Growth Factor Concentration for hair growth.
But the question is, which one is the best? PRP or GFC?
Let’s find out here:
Understanding Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP)
Platelet-Rich Plasma is a non-surgical hair treatment where doctors extract the person’s blood. Later, they centrifuge it to isolate platelet-rich plasma, and then inject it into their scalp.
The reason for using these platelets is that they have several growth factors, such as PDGF and VEGF. It helps in stimulating dormant follicles, improving blood circulation, and increasing the strand thickness.
Are you wondering how many sessions are required to cure the hair loss problem?
Well, on average, 3-6 sessions are enough, and only timely maintenance is required without any delays (or postpones).
Pros:
- Well-studied with proven efficacy in mild-to-moderate hair thinning.
- Safe and natural, with minimal downtime.
Cons:
- Results can vary; some users report an initial shed before regrowth begins.
- 3-6 sessions, and mild discomfort during injection.
What Is GFC?
GFC therapy for hair regrowth is an advanced solution derived from PRP technology.
Unlike PRP, GFC hair treatment concentrates only on the most overpowering growth factors. By removing red and white blood cells, the experts try to get a purer and more targeted extract. Once the process is done, it develops a higher growth factor concentration.
Pros:
- Quick results — need 2–4 sessions max, with effects seen in 2–3 months.
- Minimal discomfort and inflammation — thanks to its purity.
Cons:
- A little expensive (₹6,000–₹12,000 in India).
- A very specific treatment requires trained clinics and specialized equipment.
PRP vs GFC — Head‑to‑Head Comparison
| Feature | PRP | GFC |
| Growth Factors | Moderate platelet concentration | Highly purified, potent growth factors |
| Sessions | 3–6 initially, then maintenance | 2–4 sessions total |
| Results | 3–6 months for visible regrowth | 2–3 months, faster density |
| Comfort | Mild discomfort, occasional shedding | No discomfort for most people, lower inflammation |
| Cost | ₹3,000–₹6,000/session | ₹6,000–₹12,000/session |
| Availability | Widely available | More limited access, needs advanced setup |
Primarily, Platelet-Rich Plasma is the right pick when a person is facing early or mild thinning and doesn’t want to spend too much money (budget-friendly treatment). And, GFC is a faster & stronger hair regrowth treatment. It is suitable for those facing moderate-to-advanced thinning and have no budget constraint.
Final Thoughts
PRP and GFC remain powerful tools for non-surgical hair regrowth. PRP offers proven performance at a gentler pace, while GFC delivers a potent, faster alternative—especially valuable for advanced treatment.
At ISAAC Luxe, GFC hair treatment marks the next generation of hair restoration: advanced, precise, and comfortable. If you want to make the right decision in choosing the best non-surgical hair regrowth treatment, you should consider these factors at least: hair thinning stage, treatment timeline, and your budget (obviously).
If you are still confused and not able to make the right choice, book a consultation at ISAAC Luxe now. Our experts will help you explore which treatment aligns with your needs.